| Thu. 3/7 | Sun. 3/10 | Fri. 3/15 | Sat. 3/16 | Fri. 3/22 |
| vs. Iowa W 65-45 Box | Recap |
@ OhioSt W 73-67 Box | Recap |
vs. Neb W 66-62 Box | Recap |
@ MSU L 55-67 Box | Recap |
vs. Oregon 1:30 PM PT2:30 PM MT3:30 PM CT4:30 PM ET8:30 PM GMT4:30 PM 北京时间1:30 PM MST3:30 PM EST Preview |
Surging Oregon hopes to suffocate steady Wisconsin | |
No. 12 seeds in the NCAA Tournament are often plucky mid-major schools who tend to be popular upset picks. This year's tournament features three of those -- Murray State, Liberty and New Mexico State. And then there are the Oregon Ducks. MORE | |
| Leaders | |||||
| Points: | E. Happ | 17.5 | |||
| Rebounds: | E. Happ | 10.1 | |||
| Assists: | E. Happ | 4.6 | |||
| FG%: | E. Happ | 53.1% | |||
| FT%: | No qualifiers | ||||
| 3P%: | D. Trice | 40.0% | |||
| Steals: | E. Happ | 1.1 | |||
| Blocks: | N. Reuvers | 1.8 | |||
| AP Rankings | |||
| Rank | School | Rec | |
| 1 | Duke | 29-5 | |
| 2 | Virginia | 29-3 | |
| 3 | North Carolina | 27-6 | |
| 4 | Gonzaga | 31-3 | |
| 5 | Michigan State | 29-6 | |
| 6 | Tennessee | 29-5 | |
| 7 | Kentucky | 28-6 | |
| 8 | Michigan | 29-6 | |
| 9 | Texas Tech | 26-6 | |
| 10 | Florida State | 28-7 | |
| View Complete Poll | |||
| Coaches Rankings | |||
| Rank | School | Rec | |
| 1 | Duke | 29-5 | |
| 2 | Virginia | 29-3 | |
| 3 | Gonzaga | 31-3 | |
| 4 | North Carolina | 27-6 | |
| 5 | Tennessee | 29-5 | |
| 6 | Michigan State | 29-6 | |
| 7 | Kentucky | 28-6 | |
| 8 | Michigan | 29-6 | |
| 9 | Houston | 31-3 | |
| 10 | Texas Tech | 26-6 | |
| View Complete Poll | |||
| Big Ten Standings | ||
| Conference | Overall | |
| W-L | W-L | |
| 5 Michigan State | 16-4 | 29-6 |
| 13 Purdue | 16-4 | 24-9 |
| 8 Michigan | 15-5 | 29-6 |
| 21 Wisconsin | 14-6 | 23-10 |
| Maryland | 13-7 | 23-10 |
| Iowa | 10-10 | 22-11 |
| Minnesota | 9-11 | 22-13 |
| Ohio State | 8-12 | 19-14 |
| Indiana | 8-12 | 18-15 |
| Rutgers | 7-13 | 14-17 |
| Penn State | 7-13 | 14-18 |
| Illinois | 7-13 | 12-21 |
| Nebraska | 6-14 | 19-16 |
| Northwestern | 4-16 | 13-19 |
| View Full Standings | ||
| Offense (Rank) | |||||
| Points: | 69.1 (277) | ||||
| Rebounds: | 8.2 (310) | ||||
| Assists: | 12.8 (229) | ||||
| FG%: | 45.3% (127) | ||||
| FT%: | 64.9% (332) | ||||
| 3P%: | 36.6% (72) | ||||
| Defense (Rank) | |||||
| Points: | 61.4 (10) | ||||
| Rebounds: | 27.1 (53) | ||||
| Assists: | 10.3 (23) | ||||
| FG%: | 39.3% (18) | ||||
| FT%: | 66.5% (27) | ||||
| 3P%: | 31.2% (40) | ||||
© 2019 by STATS.Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of STATS is strictly prohibited.